AARP Is Open to
Cuts for Social Security Benefits
Published: June 17, 2011 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — AARP,
the powerful lobby for older Americans that has been seen as one of the leading
opponents of Social
Security benefit cuts, said on Friday that it was open to modest reductions
in benefits for future recipients.
gOur goal is to limit any changes in benefits,h John Rother, the groupfs
policy chief, said in a telephone interview, gbut we also want to see the system
made solvent.h
Mr. Rother said that the groupfs stance on possible cuts, which was first
reported in The Wall Street Journal in Fridayfs editions, should be seen less as
a major change in position than as a reflection of the political and financial
realities facing the Social Security system and the country as a whole.
gYou have to look at all the tradeoffs,h Mr. Rother said, gand what wefre
trying to do is engage the American public in that debate.h
Nonetheless, the groupfs openness to the possibility of unspecified cuts was
seen as a significant development by people on all sides of the Social Security
question, because of AARPfs powerful voice on federal policies affecting older
Americans, including Medicare,
prescription drugs and many more.
Third Way, a moderate Democratic group in Washington that has favored
possible reductions in benefits, called AARPfs position ga watershed momenth in
the debate over Social Security. gNow that they have opened the door to reform,
it is time for lawmakers to walk through it,h said Jonathan Cowan, president of
Third Way.
But other advocacy groups that are pushing to preserve Social Security
benefits accused AARP of effectively abandoning its core constituency.
Doug Henwood, the Brooklyn editor of a liberal business blog and Internet
radio program who has written on Social Security, said AARPfs willingness to
consider cuts in benefits greads like a sign that this former lobby for the
interest of older Americans has now transformed itself completely into an
insurance company.h He continued, gSurely they canft be persuaded by the merits
of the arguments, since the alleged Social Security crisis is a phantom that
canft survive a serious round of fact-checking.h
The most recent estimates from the Social Security Administration, issued
last month, indicate that under currrent law the programfs trust funds will be
exhausted by 2036, and that $6.5 trillion in additional money will be needed
over a 75-year period to pay all scheduled benefits.
Mr. Rother said that AARP expects to hear criticism from some of its members
over the new position.
gWe have such a broad membership, Mr. Rother said. gIfm sure there will be
some who will not be happy, but others will be eager to see the program put on a
stronger footing financial for the long-term.h
He made clear in an interview that the groupfs willingness to discuss cuts
comes with conditions: Reductions in benefits should be gminimal,h they should
not affect current recipients and instead should be directed gfar off in the
future,h and they should be offset by increases in revenue.
While AARP has not issued specific recommendations or figures on how benefit
reductions might be carried out, the groupfs recent discussions with its public
constituencies signal support for using increased revenue to fill two-thirds of
the projected gap and benefits reductions for one-third.
Though AARPfs position is likely to shift the debate in Washington somewhat,
its insistence that benefit cuts be pushed down the road will probably not sit
well with many Republicans, who are demanding earlier reductions as a key part
of their plans to address the nationfs overall budget deficit problem.